Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 492 F.2d 1302 - National Labor Relations Board v. Good Foods Manufacturing & Processing Corporation, Chicago Lamb Packers, Inc.-- Division, Good Foods Manufacturing & Processing Corporation, Chicago Lamb Packers, Inc.-- Division v. National Labor Relations Board, Local Union No. 87, Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, Aflcio v. National Labor Relations Board

National Labor Relations Board v. Good Foods Manufacturing & Processing Corporation, Chicago Lamb Packers, Inc.-- Division, Good Foods Manufacturing & Processing Corporation, Chicago Lamb Packers, Inc.-- Division v. National Labor Relations Board, Local Union No. 87, Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, Aflcio v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis

492 F.2d 1302 · 1974

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
March 2024
most recently cited

17 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2024

17 federal appellate ·

110197419801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc. · Parker v. Citizens Committee for the Hudson Valley · Lego v. Twomey · Sims v. Gardner · United States v. Sisson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a decree enforcing, modifying and enforcing as so modified, or setting aside in whole or in part the order of the Board. No objection that has not been urged before the Board ... shall be considered by the court, unless the failure or neglect to urge such objection shall be excused because of extraordinary circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Failure to file exceptions to the administrative law judge’s findings sometimes is excused where those findings were favorable to the petitioner, were subsequently reversed by the Board, and petitioner had no reason to file exceptions to a decision in its favor,” 492 F.2d at 1805 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “) with violations of the National Labor Relations Act (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.