Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 492 F.2d 273 - Harry J. Coman v. Sylvia R. Coman

Harry J. Coman v. Sylvia R. Coman’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
June 2013
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2013

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

6019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commissioner v. Sunnen · Cromwell v. County of Sac · Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. Patterson · Sea-Land Services, Inc. v. Gaudet · Moore v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he amount of property of each spouse, the circumstances surrounding the parties, the wife’s necessities, and the husband’s financial ability, the physical condition of the parties, the nature of their life together, and in these modern times the wife’s independence and ability to earn her own way, which must all be considered by the court in the exercise of its discretion in awarding or denying alimony. Feddersen, 68 F. Supp. 2d at 595 (citing Coman v. Coman, 492 F.2d 273, 278 (3d Cir. 1974). Thus, the touchstone for alimony determinations is a finding of need of one party and the ability of the other to pay for those needs. See id.; see, also, Poe v. Poe, 409 F.2d 40, 42-43 (3d Cir. 1969) (“statutory authorization of alimony does not necessarily mean that a wife is entitled to such an award in every case”).”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.