Gillman v. Ford’s Empirical Analysis
492 F.3d 1148 · 2007
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently February 2021 · most notably United States v. Peña-Hermosillo (2008), Tyner v. Nicholson (In Re Nicholson) (2010)
4 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 521 · 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Grogan v. Garner · Davis v. Mineta · Farmers Co-operative Ass'n v. Strunk · In Re Sampson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A [ ] court abuses its discretion where it commits a legal error or relies on clearly erroneous factual findings, or where there is no rational basis in the evidence for its ruling.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.