Hyatt v. Dudas’s Empirical Analysis
492 F.3d 1365 · 2007
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 35 U.S.C. § 112 · 35 U.S.C. § 145 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Sullivan v. Finkelstein · Molins PLC v. Textron, Inc. · Vas-Cath Inc. v. Mahurkar · In re Piasecki · Cabot Corp. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“need not be a full exposition on every conceivable deficiency of a claim.... Rather, its purpose is simply to provide sufficient notice to the applicant to facilitate his effective submission of information.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.