Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 492 F.3d 1372 - Jandreau v. Nicholson

Jandreau v. Nicholson’s Empirical Analysis

492 F.3d 1372 · 2007

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
February 2025
most recently cited

10 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably Fagan v. Shinseki (2009), Pitney Bowes Government Solutions, Inc. v. United States (2010)

10 federal appellate ·

400200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 38 U.S.C. § 1154 · 38 U.S.C. § 5107 · 38 U.S.C. § 7292

Relies on Brewer v. Quaker State Oil Refining Corp. · Aramburu v. Boeing Co. · Residential Funding Corporation v. Degeorge Financial Corp., Degeorge Home Alliance, Inc. And Degeorge Capital Corp · Jackson v. Harvard University · Vick v. Texas Employment Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the party having control over the evidence had an obligation to preserve it at the time it was destroyed; (2) the records were destroyed with a culpable state of mind; and (3) the destroyed evidence was relevant to the party’s claim or defense such that a reasonable trier of fact could find that it would support the claim or defense.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'competent medical evidence . . . [when] the determinative issue involves either medical etiology or a medical diagnosis.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “make clear that competent lay evidence can be sufficient in and of itself.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.