Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 492 F.3d 325 - Carbe v. Lappin

Carbe v. Lappin’s Empirical Analysis

492 F.3d 325 · 2007

Citation profile

73
cited by 73 later decisions
August 2018
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Jones v. Bock · McCarthy v. Bronson · Spears v. Ol McCotter · Johnson v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[FJailure to exhaust is an affirmative defense under the PLRA, and ... inmates are not required to specially plead or demonstrate exhaustion in their complaints.”). 35 . “[A]n allegation is considered denied or avoided” when”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a]ny failure to exhaust must be asserted by the defendant”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.