Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 492 F.3d 45 - Rolland v. Potter

Rolland v. Potter’s Empirical Analysis

492 F.3d 45 · 2007

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
November 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 5 district ·

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 5 U.S.C. § 8151

Relies on Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams · McCoy v. Massachusetts Institute of Technology · Calero-Cerezo v. United States Department of Justice · Sandstrom v. Chemlawn Corp. · Helfter v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To fulfill its FECA obligations to employees who suffer compensable injuries, the USPS developed an injury compensation program that specifically addresses the reassignment of employees injured on the job.” Id.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.