Three S Delaware, Inc. v. DataQuick Information Systems, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
492 F.3d 520 · 2007
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 5 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Scandinavian Reinsurance Co. v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance (2012), MCI Constructors, LLC v. City of Greensboro (2010)
10 federal appellate · 5 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 9 U.S.C. § 10 (Federal Arbitration Act)
Relies on Hoteles Condado Beach, La Concha & Convention Center v. Union De Tronquistas Local 901 · Remmey v. Painewebber, Inc. · Apex Plumbing Supply Incorporated v. US Supply Company Incorporated · Woodrow Dawahare v. Adam Spencer · Peoples Security Life Insurance Company v. Monumental Life Insurance Company B. Larry Jenkins Ronald J. Brittingham Thomas R. Jenkins Willard E. Hines
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) where the award was procured by corruption, fraud, or undue means; (2) where there was evident partiality or corruption in the arbitrators, or either of them; (3) where the arbitrators were guilty of misconduct in refusing to postpone the hearing, upon sufficient cause shown, or in refusing to hear evidence pertinent and material to the controversy; or of any other misbehavior by which the rights of any party have been prejudiced; or (4) where the arbitrators exceeded their powers, or so imperfectly executed them that a mutual, final, and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he scope of judicial review for an arbitrator's decision 'is among the narrowest known at law because to allow full scrutiny of such awards would frustrate the purpose of having arbitration at all ....'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““(1) the extent and character of the personal interest, pecuniary or otherwise, of the arbitrator in the proceedings; (2) the directness of the relationship between the arbitrator and the party he is alleged to favor; (3) the connection of that relationship to the arbitrator; and (4) the proximity in time between the relationship and the. arbitration proceeding.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.