Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 492 FAPPX 913 - Anderson v. Worstell

Anderson v. Worstell’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
March 2019
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Pearson v. Callahan · Joshua Deshaney, a Minor, by His Guardian Ad Litem, and Melody Deshaney,s v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, et al.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.