Long v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 2009
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Harris v. State · Stout v. State · Rhoton v. State · McEachern v. State · Bates v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(a) A person who communicates a threat to another person, with the intent that: (1) The other person engage in conduct against his will; or (2) The other person be placed in fear of retaliation for a prior lawful act; commits intimidation, a class A misdemeanor. “(b) However, the offense is a: (1) class D felony if: (A) That threat is to commit a forcible felony; or (B) The person to whom the threat is communicated: (i) Is á law enforcement officer; (ii) Is a judge or bailiff of any court; or (iii) Is a witness (or the spouse or child of a witness) in any pending criminal proceeding against the person making the threat; and (2) class C felony if, while committing it, the person draws or uses a deadly weapon. “(c) ‘Threat’ means an expression, by words or action, of an intention to: (1) Unlawfully injure the person threatened or another person, or damage property; (2) Unlawfully subject a person to physical confinement or restraint; (3) Commit a crime; (4) Unlawfully withhold official action, or cause such withholding; (5) Unlawfully withhold testimony or information with respect to another person’s legal claim or defense, except for a reasonable claim for witness fees or expenses; (6) Expose the person threatened to hatred, contempt, disgrace, or ridicule; or (7) Falsely harm the credit or business reputation of the person threatened.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sayles v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.