State v. Morrow’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
August 2007
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Douglas v. People of State of California · Weinberger v. Salfi · Yick Wo v. Hopkins · Shelley v. Kraemer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whether analyzed in terms of equal protection or due process, the issue cannot be resolved by resort to easy slogans or pigeonhole analysis, but rather requires a careful inquiry into such factors as “the nature of the individual interest affected, the extent to which it is affected, the rationality of the connection between legislative means and purpose, [and] the existence of alternative means for effectuating the purpose____””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Braaten
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.