Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 492 P3D 433 - State v. Jones

State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

2021

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · United States v. Salerno · Neder v. United States · United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc. · State v. Ward

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the absence of a contemporaneous objection, the failure to include an essential element of the crime in jury instructions is still reviewed for clear error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “establish that no set of circumstances exists under which the Act would be valid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “omits an essential element of the crime charged”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.