Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 492 SO2D 1245 - Farnsworth/Samuel Ltd. v. Cervini

Farnsworth/Samuel Ltd. v. Cervini’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 2018

4 state decisions

201986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Peninsular Fire Insurance Co. v. Louisiana Debating & Literary Ass'n · Whittaker v. Vetsher, Inc. · 313 So. 2d 255 - Groghan v. Billingsley · 377 So. 2d 871 - Kraft v. Baker · Groghan v. Billingsley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"A purchaser who is unable to obtain a loan stipulated in a purchase agreement, through no fault of his own, is normally relieved of his obligation to purchase and entitled to a return of his deposit. The purchaser has an implied obligation to make a good-faith effort to obtain the financing, however, and if he fails to do so, the suspensive condition to the act of sale is considered as fulfilled, and he is estopped from asserting the nullity of the contract based upon his inability to obtain financing. LSA-C.C. Art. 1772 (formerly LSA-C.C. Art. 2040 [1870])." (Citations omitted.)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] condition is regarded as fulfilled when it is not fulfilled because of the fault of a party with an interest contrary to the fulfillment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.