492 So. 2d 1322 - Lavado v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
39 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably 699 So. 2d 1312 - Franqui v. State (1997), 881 So. 2d 1087 - Chamberlain v. State (2004)
39 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pope v. State · 112 So. 2d 380 - In re Florida Appellate Rules · 469 So. 2d 917 - Williams v. State · Washington v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f he knew nothing else about the prospective jurors, the single thing that defense counsel needed to know was whether the prospective jurors could fairly and impartially consider the defense of voluntary intoxication”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The issue presented in this case is whether the trial court erred in refusing defense counsel's request to ask prospective jurors about their willingness and ability to accept the defense of voluntary intoxication. We believe the trial court's restriction of defense counsel's questioning on voir dire denied Lavado his right to a fair and impartial jury. As Judge Pearson pointed out in his dissent, "[i]f he knew nothing else about the prospective jurors, the single thing that defense counsel needed to know was whether the prospective jurors could fairly and impartially consider the defense of voluntary intoxication. " Lavado v. State, 469 So.2d 917, 919 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). [emphasis supplied]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“their ability to entertain or accept the premise of voluntary intoxication as a defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.