Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

492 So. 2d 1329

492 So.2d 1329

11 Fla.L.Weekly 449

Florida Bar v. Wolf

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 28, 1986

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1986-08-28

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1986-08-28

How this case has been cited

Cited by 315 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2016 · most notably Metro-North Commuter Railroad v. Buckley (1997), Matter of Jobes (1987)

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 299 state decisions — followed in 13 states

15501986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1This disciplinary proceeding is before us on complaint of The Florida Bar, respondent’s conditional guilty plea, and the uncontested report of the referee. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

¶2The referee recommended that respondent be found guilty of violating article XI, Rule 11.02(4)(c) (violating trust accounting procedures) of the Bylaws under the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, and that she: (1) be publicly reprimanded; (2) be placed on probation for three years subject to multiple conditions; and (3) be required to pay costs.

¶3We approve the referee’s findings and recommendations. Accordingly, we direct that respondent appear for a public reprimand at the next meeting of the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar and that respondent be placed on a three-year probation subject to the conditions contained within the referee’s report.

¶4Judgment for costs in the amount of $300 is hereby entered against respondent, for which sum let execution issue.

¶5It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARKETT, JJ., concur.
/492/so2d/1329 · .json · Public domain