Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 492 So. 2d 1353 - Rose v. State

492 So. 2d 1353 - Rose v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
January 1995
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. · 457 So. 2d 481 - State v. Neil · 486 So. 2d 565 - State v. Castillo · People v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he trial judge [has] broad discretion to determine whether an inquiry into racially neutral reasons for peremptory challenges must be made. . . . The reason for this is that one present at voir dire can make observations which the record does not necessarily disclose and which could explain peremptory challenges on race neutral grounds.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.