492 So. 2d 448 - Scott v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 476 So. 2d 158 - Albritton v. State · 475 So. 2d 1218 - Hendrix v. State · 488 So. 2d 523 - State v. Mischler · 492 So. 2d 1308 - Williams v. State · 469 So. 2d 865 - Scott v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. Defendant created an extreme risk to the safety of many citizens in his attempt to escape apprehension following commission of the crime. 2. The sentencing guidelines recommendation of 5 1/2 to 7 years is insufficient for retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, and for the safety of the public. 3. Defendant's criminal history indicates that a prison term of 5 1/2 to 7 years is inadequate punishment for this defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“there is now a conflict among the district courts over the validity of the second ground; and, in light of [ Williams v. State, 492 So.2d 1308 (Fla. 1986)], we seriously question whether this ground remains valid.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he second reason in the case sub judice represents little more than the trial court's disagreement with the recommended sentence,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.