Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 492 So. 2d 562 - Graves v. State

492 So. 2d 562 - Graves v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently September 2013 · most notably McFee v. State (1987), 554 So. 2d 887 - Shell v. State (1989)

37 state decisions

2301986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · Bordenkircher v. Hayes · United States v. Jackson · Relford v. Commandant, U. S. Disciplinary Barracks · Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The trial judge is empowered with the discretion to consider and to decide what evidence is admissible, and `unless this judicial discretion is so abused as to be prejudicial to the accused,' then the ruling of the lower court must be affirmed.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is well settled in this state that proof of a crime distinct from that alleged in an indictment is not admissible against an accused. There are certain recognized exceptions to the rule. Proof of another crime is admissible where the offense charged and that offered to be proved are so connected as to constitute one transaction, where it is necessary to identify the defendant, where it is material to prove motive and there is an apparent relation or connection between the act proposed to be proved and that charged, where the accusation involves a series of criminal acts which must be proved to make out the offense, or where it is necessary to prove scienter or guilty knowledge, (emphasis added).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.