492 So. 2d 642 - Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 2005
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 47 Ala. App. 65 - Ireland v. State · 475 So. 2d 628 - Ex Parte Alexander · 475 So. 2d 625 - Stork v. State · 492 So. 2d 622 - German v. State · 422 So. 2d 812 - Whorton v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`The factual basis [can be] established, in part, by the appellant's admission that he knew to what offense he was pleading guilty.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The Alexander decision, however, is distinguishable from the present case because of two important factors. In Alexander , the appellant was a participant in a work release program and was convicted of first degree escape. In the case sub judice , the appellant was convicted of second degree escape for wilfully failing to return to his 'place of residence,' where he was confined as a participant in the 'Supervised Intensive Restitution,' or 'S.I.R.,' program.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“By statute, an inmate who willfully fails to abide by the confining restrictions imposed upon him by the S.I.R. program will be considered to have 'escaped' from the 'custody' of a 'penal facility.' Thus, the appellant was properly convicted of the offense of second degree escape.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.