Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 492 So. 2d 775 - Monihon v. Monihon

492 So. 2d 775 - Monihon v. Monihon’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 1989
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cann v. Cann · 309 So. 2d 26 - Lee v. Lee · 113 So. 2d 547 - Kosch v. Kosch · 4 Smith & H. 166 - Schlosser Leather Co. v. Gillespie · Byrd v. Michael

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Given this provision, the wife was not required to assess her needs until that period expired. We think the wife, by filing her petition within forty-two days after the expiration of the rehabilitative period, did so within a reasonable period of time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.