492 So. 2d 833 - Bing v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 1992
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · 484 So. 2d 6 - Florida Bar v. Goodman · 454 So. 2d 675 - O'BRIEN v. State · 401 So. 2d 890 - Bartee v. State · 418 So. 2d 1070 - Miles v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Can one taking of property valued at $100.00 or more, with force, support dual convictions for robbery and grand theft, or is the degree of theft irrelevant to double jeopardy considerations absent an indication of contrary legislative intent?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“falsely indicate[s] a substantive difference between offenses when there is actually only a difference between degrees of one substantive offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.