Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 492 SO2D 970 - Porter v. State

Porter v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2000
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 2000

6 state decisions

30198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 440 So. 2d 297 - Groseclose v. State · 454 So. 2d 445 - Billiot v. State · United States v. Cohen · United States v. Byers · 351 So. 2d 1342 - Gray v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This Court has held many times that lay testimony, as well as expert testimony, is admissible to prove a defendant's mental capacity to distinguish right from wrong at the time the crime is committed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “if a lay witness does not observe a defendant at the moment of the crime the witness may not give opinion testimony concerning the defendant's sanity at that moment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “To be M'Naughten insane, a defendant must be unable to distinguish right from wrong at the time the act is committed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.