Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 492 S.W.2d 281 - White v. State

White v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2018

11 state decisions

3019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hay v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When the jury agrees upon a verdict, it shall be brought into court by the proper officer; and if it states, that it has agreed, the verdict shall be read aloud by the clerk. If in proper form and no juror dissents therefrom, and neither party requests a poll of the jury, the verdict shall be entered upon the minutes of the court. Acts 1965, 59th Leg., vol. 2, p. 317, ch. 722.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The State or the defendant shall have the right to have the jury polled, which is done by calling separately the name of each juror and asking him if the verdict is his. If all, when asked, answer in the affirmative, the verdict shall be entered upon the minutes; but if any juror answer in the negative, the jury shall retire again to consider its verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “without first inquiring of the jury if not guilty was their verdict ... amounted to an instructed verdict of guilty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.