Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 492 SW2D 397 - State v. Wilhite

State v. Wilhite’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
March 1995
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 1995

10 state decisions

70197319801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Burns v. United States · American Railway Express Co. v. Kentucky · Yates v. United States · McCulley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Such distinction has been recognized elsewhere. The degree of proof necessary for parole or probation revocation is less than that required to sustain a criminal conviction. The hearing judge need only be reasonably satisfied that the terms of the parole have been violated ...”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.