Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 493 F.2d 400 - Moran v. Edson

Moran v. Edson’s Empirical Analysis

493 F.2d 400 · 1974

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
April 2014
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 2014

3 federal appellate · 2 district ·

3019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Callanan v. . K., A.C. L.C.R.R. Co. · Maytag Company v. Alward · Murphy v. Washington American League Base Ball Club, Inc. · Irwin v. West End Development Co. · Saltz v. Saltz Bros.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “implements the general rule that a court of equity may appoint a receiver when there are such dissensions in the board of directors of a corporation or between two groups of its stockholders, each holding an equal number of shares, that it is impossible to carry on the business with advantage to the parties interested, even though the corporation is solvent. And in such a case the court may direct the sale of the corporate property for the protection of the creditors and benefit of the stockholders and order a dissolution of the corporation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “(I)n the case of a closely held corporation . . . where the directors are also the officers and stockholders, self-dealing on salary questions may be inevitable as a practical matter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.