Schroeder v. Tilton’s Empirical Analysis
493 F.3d 1083 · 2007
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Calder et Wife, v. Bull et Wife. · Hopt v. People of the Territory of Utah · Carmell v. Texas · Avila v. Galaza
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“states from enacting laws that criminalize an act already performed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Doe v. Busby
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.