Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 493 F.3d 988 - Crum v. Vincent

Crum v. Vincent’s Empirical Analysis

493 F.3d 988 · 2007

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 2021

5 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

80200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1320A (§ 1121 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Goldberg v. Kelly · Armstrong v. Manzo · Leila Jeanne Hill Audrey Himmelmann Everitt Simpsons v. Colorado · Jones v. Flowers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]n individual does not have a vested right to be free from suit or sanction for a legal violation until the statute of limitations for that violation has expired.” Crum v. Vincent, 493 F.3d 988, 997 (8th Cir.2007). 19 . Doe argues that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.