Percell's Inc. v. Central Telephone Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
5 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Relies on Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · United States of America Ex Rel. G. Daniel Walker v. Jacob B. Gunn, People of the State of California v. G. Daniel Walker · 223 F. Supp. 669 - Benson v. Bradley · Gobet v. Intercontinental Hotels Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“are mandatory and are to be strictly construed when asserted by a party”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.