Carter v. Blum’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1337 · 42 U.S.C. § 1786 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 301 (§ 1 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 7 U.S.C. § 2011 (Charitable Assistance and Food Bank Act of 1987) · 7 U.S.C. § 2013
Relies on Knebel v. Hein · Anderson v. Butz · Russo v. Kirby · Bates v. Toia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Both the regulations and the legislative history envision household receipt of funds that are used to .support an identifiable third person who is not a member of the household. (Footnote omitted.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.