Young v. Hoke’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 2005
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brown v. Keill · McKenna v. Austin · Wecker v. Kilmer · Cooper v. Robert Hall Clothes, Inc. · 4 Kan. App. 2d 188 - Geier v. Wikel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“and other settlements denominated covenants not to sue, covenants not to execute or loan-receipt agreements. We have done so despite the fact that the distinction is entirely artificial. 493 N.E.2d at 1281 . (Citation omitted; footnote omitted.) Governmental entities have been exempted from the application of the Indiana Comparative Fault Act. I.C. XX-X-XX-X. A governmental entity means”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.