¶1Of the two grounds upon which the trial court may arguably have granted the defendants-appellees’ motion to dismiss, one, the failure to produce the alleged confidential informant, is foreclosed by State v. Gonzalez Rodriguez, 483 So.2d 807 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), and cases cited; the other, based upon the fact that payment to the c.i. was contingent upon the quantity of drugs seized as a result of his efforts, is contrary to State v. Prieto, 479 So.2d 320 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). Accordingly, the order under review is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
493 So. 2d 547
493 So.2d 547
11 Fla.L.Weekly 1929
State v. Perez
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 9, 1986
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1986-09-09
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 1999
3 state decisions
Relies on 479 So. 2d 320 - State v. Prieto · 483 So. 2d 807 - State v. Gonzalez-Rodriguez
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1986-09-09
View the full empirical analysis of this case →