493 So. 2d 574 - State v. Vanderpool’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably 630 So. 2d 1278 - State v. Robertson (1994), 530 So. 2d 526 - State v. Copeland (1988)
44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 391 So. 2d 421 - State v. Gibson · 384 So. 2d 773 - State v. Boutte · State v. Lee · 390 So. 2d 1317 - State v. Simmons · State v. Joles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A. A defendant may not assign as error a ruling refusing to sustain a challenge for cause made by him, unless an objection thereto is made at the time of the ruling. The nature of the objection and grounds therefor shall be stated at the time of objection.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[a] judgment or ruling shall not be reversed by an appellate court because of any error ... which does not affect substantial rights of the accused.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[o]ur law is ... settled that an objection need not be raised by incantation.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Record · State v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.