Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 493 So. 2d 766 - State v. Jacobs

493 So. 2d 766 - State v. Jacobs’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably 865 So. 2d 284 - State v. Hampton (2004), State v. Parker (2007)

50 state decisions

3501986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Blockburger v. United States · Brown v. Ohio · State v. Oliveaux · Angrist v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “subject for the same offenses to be twice put into jeopardy of life or limb.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If the evidence required to support a finding of guilt of one crime would also have supported the conviction of the other, the two are the same offense under a plea of double jeopardy, and a defendant can be placed in jeopardy for only one. The test depends on the evidence necessary for conviction, not all the evidence introduced at trial.... The "same evidence test" is somewhat broader in concept than Blockburger the central idea being that one should not be punished (or put in jeopardy) twice for the same course of conduct.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “test, convictions for the crimes of aggravated burglary and armed robbery do not violate the principle of double jeopardy because the two offenses do not contain identical elements, neither offense is a lesser included offense of the other, and the offenses, although possessing similar elements, do not require the”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.