Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 493 SO2D 795 - Anderton v. Akin

Anderton v. Akin’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2015

8 state decisions

301986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rockholt v. Keaty · Farr v. MONTGOMERY WARD & CO., INCORPORATED · Hall v. Board of Supervisors, Southern University · Esta v. Dover Corp. · Littlejohn v. Cox

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The owner of the enclosed estate may construct on the right of way the type of road or railroad reasonably necessary for the exercise of the servitude.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “shall be suitable for the kind of traffic that is reasonably necessary for the use of that estate.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"In determining the place where the right of way shall be exercised, the matter is not left entirely at the caprice or option of the party compelled to grant the servitude. At the same time that due regard will be paid to his interests, and even to his convenience in the premises, the court will keep in view the rights which the law intends to secure to the opposite party. The road awarded must be such a one as will be serviceable, one, of which he may derive the contemplated advantage of a force [sic] expropriation. The defendants cannot exact that an extremely circuitous, impracticable and expensive route should be taken by the plaintiff, because it may happen to be less burdensome to the former."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.