Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 493 U.S. 1 - Terrell v. Morris, Superintendent, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility

Terrell v. Morris, Superintendent, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
December 2013
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2013

6 federal appellate · 1 district ·

901989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedUnited States v. Robert W. Bradford (from Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on State v. Cole · State v. Hester · Pennsylvania v. Bruder · United States v. Robert W. Bradford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is not our place to vacate a Court of Appeals' opinion on the supposition that the court failed to give sufficient thought to its own holding, merely because we would prefer a more extended discussion”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Before Cole, Ohio had permitted ineffective assistance claims in collateral challenges even if a petitioner had not raised those claims when represented by new counsel on direct appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.