Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 494 A.2d 80 - Casey v. Casey

Casey v. Casey’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
July 2008
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently July 2008 · most notably Perreault v. Perreault (1988), Thompson v. Thompson (1994)

29 state decisions

170198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cann v. Cann · 158 N.J. Super. 313 - Turner v. Turner · Brierly v. Brierly · Tarro v. Tarro · D'Agostino v. D'Agostino

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"(1) The length of the marriage; "(2) The conduct of the parties during the marriage; “(3) The contribution of each of the parties during the marriage in the acquisition, preservation, or appreciation in value of their respective estates; "(4) The contribution and services of either party as a homemaker; "(5) The health and age of the parties; “(6) The amount and sources of income of each of the parties; "(7) The occupation and employability of each of the parties; "(8) The opportunity of each party for future acquisition of capital assets and income; "(9) The contribution by one party to the education, training, licensure, business, or increased earning power of the other; "(10) The need of the custodial parent to occupy or own the marital residence and to use or own its household effects taking into account the best interests of the children of the marriage; "(11) Either party’s wasteful dissipation of assets or any transfer or encumbrance of assets made in contemplation of divorce without fair consideration; and “(12) Any factor which the court shall expressly find to be just and proper.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Shramek v. Shramek

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.