Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

494 A.2d 932

In re Wolff

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · decided 1985-07-11

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 2009

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relies on Matter of Wolff

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-07-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2On consideration of the petition of respondent for rehearing and rehearing en banc, the opposition of the Bar Counsel and the response of the Board on Professional Responsibility thereto, it is

¶3ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is denied, and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this Court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

¶4FURTHER ORDERED that the petition of respondent for rehearing en banc is granted and the opinions of April 8, 1985, 490 A.2d 1118, are vacated. It is

¶5FURTHER ORDERED that respondent is directed to file a brief (10 copies) within 30 days from the date of this order and Bar Counsel is directed to file a brief (10 copies) within 30 days after the brief of respondent is filed. The Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the Court sitting en banc as soon as the business of the Court permits.

/494/a2d/932 · .json · Public domain