Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. Civil Aeronautics Board’s Empirical Analysis
494 F.2d 1118 · 1974
Citation profile
27 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United States · United States v. Storer Broadcasting Co. · Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc. · LundBerg v. Bannan · United States v. Ohio Power Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““To be sure, ALPA’s principal argument is not that full-scale hearings on labor protective provisions must be held in every exemption or suspension case, but that such hearings were required in this particular case because our prior opinion specifically so directed.” 494 F.2d at 1128 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The Federal Aviation Act of 1958 relieved the Board of primary responsibility for safety regulation, placing that responsibility instead upon the FAA * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.