Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 494 F.2d 1277 - Remmers v. Brewer

Remmers v. Brewer’s Empirical Analysis

494 F.2d 1277 · 1974

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2016 · most notably Willis v. Ciccone (1974), Teterud v. Burns (1975)

23 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

25019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 361 F. Supp. 537 - Remmers v. Brewer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Court is well aware of the possibility that the Church of the New Song may be only a sham religion created to serve as a convenient vehicle for the presentation of political claims. But the as yet unsubstantiated anxieties of this Court cannot justify the possible suffocation of religious freedoms. If the Church of the New Song should prove to be a hoax and front that the state claim it is, that eventuality can be dealt with by both the prison administration and this Court. Nor should it be thought that by granting the Eclatarians religious rights the prison administration is laying itself open to uncontrollable hazards. The prison administration has a strong interest in seeing that the facilities and benefits enjoyed by the Church of the New Song are not abused or used for other than religious purposes. Meetings can be observed or mail monitored to see that this is the case. Given the power vested in prison authorities to take reasonable precautions to prevent potential abuses, any phoney believers should find their jest most unrewarding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Further there is insufficient evidence in this record to establish appellants’ contention that appellees’ beliefs are not sincere and genuinely felt. It also appears that appellees have not been allowed a fair and meaningful opportunity to freely exercise their religion in the same degree as other inmates, Protestant and Catholic. The district court’s order requiring that this situation be corrected is affirmed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.