Winzer v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis

494 F.3d 1192 · 2007

Citation profile

cited by 12 later decisions

states following

May 2019

most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Crawford v. Washington · Kotteakos v. United States · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Brecht v. Abrahamson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“is demonstrated if the error in question had a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Fidelity National Title Co. v. First American Title Insurance Co.
“substantial and injurious effect or influence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Fidelity National Title Co. v. First American Title Insurance Co.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.