Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 494 F.3d 1337 - Proctor v. Fluor Enterprises, Inc.

Proctor v. Fluor Enterprises, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

494 F.3d 1337 · 2007

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
August 2024
most recently cited

9 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Tampa Bay Water v. HDR Engineering, Inc. (2013), Burchfield v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2011)

9 federal appellate ·

310200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation · Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc. · United States v. Frazier

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We review a district court's evidentiary rulings for abuse of discretion.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In diversity of citizenship actions, state law defines the nature of defenses, but the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide the manner and the time in which defenses are raised and when waiver occurs.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “bears the burden of proving that the error probably had a substantial influence on the jury's verdict.” Id. at 1352 (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). . The requisite intent requires”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.