Weber v. Battista’s Empirical Analysis
494 F.3d 179 · 2007
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 110 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 143 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Baloch v. Kempthorne (2008), Steele v. Schafer (2008)
12 federal appellate · 110 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks · Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White · National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan · Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 143 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“engaged in protected activity, as a consequence of which her employer took a materially adverse action against her.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“issues or claims like or related to those in the complaint.” 29 C.F.R. § 1614.106 (d). It is now apparent that the non-selection claim was inarguably related to the pay claim. The EEOC has explained (and case law confirms) that a claim”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“could well dissuade a reasonable worker from making or supporting a charge of discrimination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Warren v. Pon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.