Teas v. Endicott’s Empirical Analysis
494 F.3d 580 · 2007
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Carey Warden v. Saffold · Clay v. United States · Evans v. Chavis · Anderson v. Litscher · Shepeck v. United States
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.