494 F. Supp. 2d 979 - Beth v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 402 (§ 202 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 406 (§ 206 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Cotter v. Harris · Sarchet v. Chater · Zurawski v. Halter · Steele v. Barnhart · Joseph T. FRUSTAGLIA, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, Appellee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is well-established that evidence from a prior application, even if not re-opened, can be relevant to a claim of disability with a later onset date.” Beth v. As- true, 494 F.Supp.2d 979, 1006 (E.D.Wis.2007). . See also Hamlin v. Barnhart, 365 F.3d 1208, 1215 (10th Cir.2004) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Davidson v. Colvin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.