Red Fox v. Hettich’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2024
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1151 (Indian Crimes Act of 1976) · 18 U.S.C. § 1152 · 18 U.S.C. § 1153 · 18 U.S.C. § 1162 · 25 U.S.C. § 1911 (§ 101 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978) · 25 U.S.C. § 1919 (§ 109 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978) · 28 U.S.C. § 1360 · 28 U.S.C. § 1738
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · Kulko v. Superior Court of California in and for City and County of San Francisco · Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez · Hilton v. Guyot
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Subject matter jurisdiction relates to the power of a court to hear and determine a general class of cases to which a particular proceeding belongs. Leon v. Numkena, 142 Ariz. 307 , 689 P.2d 566, 568 (1984) (citations omitted). See also Harris v. Young, 473 N.W.2d 141, 143-44 (S.D.1991); In re Guardianship of Flyinghorse, 456 N.W.2d 567, 568 (S.D.1990); State ex. rel. Joseph v. Redwing, 429 N.W.2d 49, 51 (1988). A court’s jurisdiction of the subject matter ... exists when a constitution or statute specifically confers upon the court such jurisdiction. Timmerman v. Timmerman, 163 Neb. 704 , 81 N.W.2d 135 (1957). This power is likewise conferred upon Indian courts by their constitutions or tribal codes. See generally Cohen, Federal Indian Law, p. 428 (1958). Leon, 689 P.2d at 568 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Crow“[m]ore in the way of `minimum contacts' is required for a tribal court to exercise long-arm jurisdiction over a non-Indian `than would be sufficient for the citizen of one state to assert personal jurisdiction over the citizen of another state.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re JDMC
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.