Hutton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 2019
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Samples v. State · Davie v. State · Lester v. State · 60 Okla. Crim. 436 - McGee v. State · 68 Okla. Crim. 63 - Thomas v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is the theory of the Defendant that he neither knew nor had reason to believe the canned goods and other grocery items were stolen at the time he purchased the same, and that he was without criminal intent. (Appellant’s Brief Pg. 10)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kinsey v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.