Stott v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1973
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Gilbert v. California · Sussman v. District Court of Oklahoma County · Smith v. State · Story v. State · 97 Okla. Crim. 249 - Spears v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We believe the Attorney General is correct when he states in his brief, Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263 , 87 S.Ct. 1951 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 , provides that it is not required that counsel be present when handwriting exemplars are taken from an accused; nor does the taking of such exemplars violate the constitutional rights of the defendant.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Buzzard v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.