Everson v. Everson’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
2 district · 41 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently May 2003 · most notably 338 Pa. Super. 458 - Noetzel v. Glasgow, Inc. (1985), 329 Ill. App. 3d 908 - Bianchi v. Savino Del Bene International Freight Forwarders, Inc. (2002)
2 district · 41 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hanson v. Denckla · Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Hunt · Willcox v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance · Stambaugh v. Stambaugh · Morris Lapidus Associates v. Airportels, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... the mere fact that a party has made a motion in the trial court to ... modify the judgment ... does not deprive the judgment of its conclusive effect between the parties. Where an execution is issued under a judgment which is subsequently amended or modified, regularity may be imparted to the execution by an amendment of the judgment on which it is based and by its entry nunc proe tunc.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“enforcement of the judgment in Pennsylvania was authorized by the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act, 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 4306, which provides that at any time after the filing of a foreign judgment, a levy may be made on any property of the judgment debtor subject to execution regardless of whether final judgment has been obtained.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.