494 So. 2d 198 - Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2003
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 474 So. 2d 743 - Ellard v. State · 474 So. 2d 758 - Ex Parte Ellard · 395 So. 2d 1054 - Wilcox v. State · Horman v. State · 140 Cal. App. Supp. 2d 962 - People v. Rye
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The term ‘probation’ connotes that the probationer’s relief from the penalty of imprisonment is conditional on good behavior. 24 C.J.S. Criminal Law § 1752(2) (1961). The Supreme Court of Alabama held in Wilcox v. State, 395 So.2d 1054, 1056 (Ala.1981): . “ ‘[A] condition implicit in every suspended or probationary sentence [is] that defendant, while under such sentence, will not commit another criminal offense.’ ””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““[B]eyond any expressed condition of probation, there exists the implied condition that the probationer live and remain at liberty without violating the law. Moore v. State, 494 So.2d 198 (Ala.Cr.App.1986); Ellard v. State, 474 So.2d 743 (Ala.Cr.App.1984), aff'd, 474 So.2d 758 (Ala.1985).””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McKinnon v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.