Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 494 So. 2d 270 - Freeman v. State

494 So. 2d 270 - Freeman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 1993
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 246 So. 2d 771 - Richardson v. State · 71 Cal. 2d 761 - People v. Schader · 172 So. 2d 824 - Hedges v. State · United States v. Walling · 438 So. 2d 803 - Engle v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The record supports appellee's argument that it did not introduce the police officer's testimony for the purpose of proving that appellant was guilty of the sale of cocaine, or for the purpose of establishing that appellant had offered to sell the cocaine. The officer's testimony showed only that they went to the apartment because they had information that an offer to sell cocaine had occurred at that location. We hold that the court properly admitted this testimony on the authority of Johnson.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.